Stay-At-Home-Moms
by William P. Wilson, M.D.
-- Commentaries from past newsletters -- Fall 2005

Printable Version

Protected by Common Law Copyright
This may be copied for personal use only.
William P. Wilson, M. D.
Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, N. C.
Director, Institute of Christian Growth
Box 2357 Burlington, N. C.
27216-2347

Recently I had the privilege of
visiting with a colleague who is a
"stay at
home mom."
She has an MD and is trained in a specialty. She was a very successful
practitioner and could have continued her successful career except she was
torn between nurturing her children and her career. She chose to nurture her
children. This stimulated me to try to determine why some women who are
highly educated would want to stay at home and care for their children when
they are capable of successful careers. I, therefore, interviewed a number
of women who had been, or are at present, stay at home moms to see what
motivated them into their alternative careers. I have to admit that most of
these women are Christian so the results are obviously biased, but most of
you who read this letter are Christians so you will read it with a similar
bias.
Many years ago I was on an airplane going to New York and
did not have reading material or work with me so I went to the magazine rack
(they had them in those days), and the only magazine left was
"Ebony."
A cover headline caught my attention. It read
"The Plot
to Destroy the Black Race."
This intrigued me so I took the magazine back to my seat and opened it to
the article. It was written by a black female child psychiatrist named
Frances Welsing who taught at Howard University Medical School in Washington
DC. It was her thesis that the feminist movement encouraging women into the
workplace would destroy the black race. She strongly asserted that
motherless and/or fatherless children would not grow up to be mentally
healthy adults and would, therefore, destroy themselves. This article was
written in the 60’s so illegitimacy was not as rampant as it is today among
blacks (70%), the drug culture had not influenced the black world and the
black on black crime wave had not started. How prophetic she was!
At that time, I was developing an interest in how family
structure influenced mental illness. So after I read the mildly paranoid
discourse directed toward feminists (who are almost all white) I was amazed
to see that she clearly stated what I knew were the biblical roles for a
husband and wife as ideal roles for all. She said that the ideal role for a
husband was the protector of the home, the breadwinner and disciplinarian of
children with love and kindness. The mother was to be the homemaker, the
child socializer, and disciplinarian with love and kindness. A woman's
career was to be in the home.
Today it is politically correct for women to have
careers. Almost half of the students in medical schools are women. They are
commonly found in all other professional schools and in the business world.
They are also frequently found in the military schools of our nation. A few
have invaded the worlds of men=s
golf and auto racing. Teaching, nursing, office work and food services are
still major areas of endeavor for women, but the attitude of feminists is
that working in such jobs is demeaning. Interestingly, these jobs are
nurturant and ideally suited to women's
basic biological make up.
Men and women are unequivocally different. They are
endocrinologically, physiologically and anatomically different. Men and
women have different hormones. Women have cyclic hormonal secretion and men's
hormonal secretion is acyclic. Cyclic hormonal activity is not related to
sexual object choice since male homosexuals do not have cyclic hormonal
activity whereas female homosexuals do have cyclic secretion of hormones.
One sees behavioral differences in males and females
almost immediately after birth. Males are more irritable and active. They
demand and get more attention from their mothers. As children grow older,
males are less reluctant to leave their mothers and are less fearful. Males
are more aggressive both displaying and eliciting competition. Boys are more
likely to seek solutions to problems and are more inquisitive.
As early as the third year of life little girls show
nurturant tendencies. They will look after younger siblings and play at
being mommies. Their love for children draws them to babies and small
children no matter where they are. They love to hold them and play with
them. When they grow older they are excellent baby sitters because they
naturally love their wards. In studies we did years ago on arousal from
sleep in children, we found that even before they reach maturity girls will
dramatically wake from a deep sleep to the crying of a baby. Boys and men do
not wake to a baby crying unless the men have children of their own. Once
they have children they wake almost as readily and quickly as women do. For
women this is an inherent capacity. For men, it is a learned one.
Intellectually, girls are more likely to persist in
learning whereas boys are more distractable. There is a greater need later
in life for boys to have to self actualize, i.e.
"to find
themselves,"
before they will diligently pursue academic endeavors.
I tell you these things because they relate to why many
women want to stay at home to rear their children. In my inquiries of women
who stayed at home to rear their children, their primary reason was that
they did not want someone else to raise their children. This was true of the
young pediatrician I spoke with. Another reason why women stay at home is to
home school. They may not necessarily teach their children all that they
need to know, but they can see to it that they are presented the right
subject matter in a way that is compatible with the family=s
belief system. Mothers who stay at home can take their children to dancing,
to gymnastics, swimming, music, T-ball, scouts and other activities. If they
work and have no extended family available their children miss out. There is
one important thing that stay at home moms provide and that is a sense of
security. As soon as they become toddlers children may stray away from their
mother=s
presence, but they Acheck
in@
every once in a while to make sure that mother is still there. Even in high
school they like to have mom there when they come home. Children never lose
this tendency. My 40-50 year old children still check in one or more times a
week with their mom by phone or visit, and accept me only if I answer first
or she is not available. There is something in mothering that bonds the
child to the parent. I would suspect it is the RNA in their cells. I say
this with tongue in cheek, but there is no question that children do not
inherit RNA from their fathers. They only get DNA. Their mother's
RNA has some effect on heredity but it is minimal. Even so it has been said
that the female's
RNA can be traced back to prehistoric humans in Africa which is the reason
that most evolutionists believe that mankind got his/her start there.
Recently I have seen the results of the work that six
stay at home moms had on their children. They have all home schooled their
children. Twenty years ago I wrote a newsletter in which I described our
experiences in a house church in which these women and their families were
involved. I was very impressed with the development of religious maturity in
the children in that group. I saw that those children were much further
along in their moral and religious development than the children who were
taught in the Sunday schools of most churches. This was true of their social
development too. I was aware of the kind of drivel that mainline
denominational publishing houses turn out for children as a result of my
time on the curriculum resources committee of the UMC. I not only was aware
of the Methodist, but also the Presbyterian and Baptist materials. The
latter was much better, but none of it did the job it should have done.
What I have seen in the last year is the maturation of
those children who were in the house church. It is interesting that when
they were pre-adolescents they learned what their parents wanted them to
learn. They also accepted Christ because their parents wanted them to accept
him. Even so in time they did find Jesus for themselves. My grandson told
his mother, something like,
"Before, I
had your Jesus, but I had to find him for myself."
On Sunday we went to a shower for one of the children who
grew up in our house church who is now getting married. I had never gone to
a shower before. I thought it was a girl thing. But I had been invited, and
my wife insisted that I go. I acquiesced out of respect for the parents of
the groom. The shower was quite informal. We came as we were and when I got
there, there were only a few other men. Absent among the guests was the
father of the groom, who like me, did not believe that he was supposed to
attend. He was called and finally did come.
I asked my wife before we left what women did at showers.
She said "we
talk and play games, open gifts and enjoy the company of others."
I asked what kind of games they played, but she would not elaborate since
she knew I dislike parlor games. Finally, after the initial socializing I
found that the purpose (conceived by my creative daughter-in-law) was to
pray for the success of the marriage and to bless the bride and groom. That
was what we did and I participated wholeheartedly. It was a very moving time
for all and especially the engaged couple. It brought back into my
consciousness all kinds of memories of the earlier years of the groom=s
life. It also revealed the spiritual state of the bride to be. She is a
turned on Spirit filled young lady who came out of a stable pagan
background. Since the groom is a Spirit filled Christian, it means that they
will be equally yoked. With this one credential they have a 99% chance of
having a successful marriage. All of the children in our house church who
are now getting married have met their husbands or wives either at the
church they attend or at some Christian meeting. The stability of their
marriage is also reasonably assured since they have courted for more than a
year, have not broken up and have learned to communicate well. In addition,
their faith enhances their love for one another and will help them work out
whatever differences they may have. Having forgotten themselves and put
Jesus first in their lives they will be able to do the same with each other.
In marriage we have to be selfless and not selfish. When Jesus said to deny
ourselves and be obedient to his leadership, he set a standard for marriage
as well.
In a real Christian marriage we put the best interests
and welfare of our spouse above our own. We do the same in our faith if we
are true disciples. In our courtship we installed our mate in ourselves.
They have become one with us, therefore, wherever we go they go too, and
vice versa. When I used to spend two months in Africa I always had Elizabeth
with me even though she was at home. I was not one of these people who
called my wife every night, because it was too expensive, but I thought of
her every day and sent postcards at least twice a week. There was no out of
sight out of mind relationship. She was always on my mind.
Our relationship with the Lord should be the same. We
live our lives for him and he goes with us wherever we go. There is an
interesting article in the last issue of the Biblical Archeology Review by
Andre Lemaire a famous archeologist who describes how he thought the
"local"
God of Israel became the God of the world. I am sure that God revealed to
Daniel and Ezekiel his omnipresence just as Jesus revealed that there is no
one place where we worship God. If you remember he was talking to the
Samaritan woman at the well, and said that God was not to be worshiped in a
place, but was to be worshiped in Spirit and truth wherever we are (John
4:21-24). In this scripture Jesus revealed God's
omnipresence. So just as we take our wives and husbands with us wherever we
go we also take Jesus (the Holy Spirit) with us wherever we go. It amuses me
that in some of our music we will ask the Holy Spirit to come to us when in
truth he is always with us. We only have to give his Spirit permission to
control us or reveal his presence to us. If I am consciously thinking about
God, he is there just as my wife or my children are. It is true that we have
to want God to reveal himself to us, but he is available and if we keep on
asking he will make himself known.
Getting back to the subject I started to discuss, I would
not be the least bit surprised if all the women in these couples will want
to be stay at home moms if it is possible. It is always possible if they are
frugal and do not let their wants destroy their destiny as a homemaker. None
of us should find it necessary to live in big houses, drive the most
expensive cars, have the nicest clothes, eat in the best restaurants, and
vacation in the most exotic places.
In the world today most of us are besieged with
temptation to have things that we do not really need. Since we listen to the
siren songs of the advertisements, we feel we have to have the income that
will allow us to possess those things. A good example is food advertising.
If I pick up Good Housekeeping, I find all kinds of pictures of delicious
dishes. I start salivating and my desire is to get one of those dishes. I
suggest to my wife that I want to have some of that product so she, wanting
to please me, gets it the next time she goes to the store. This product is
almost pure carbohydrate so it will not do my diabetes any good, and will
kick up my blood sugar. When it is served I cannot resist the temptation to
eat it one more time. The next morning my blood sugar is up 10 or 15 mg/dl.
If we have unrestrained wants we are going to have to
have a big income to satisfy our desires and wives will have to work. There
are many of those who in the modern world live by the maxim that
expenditures always rise to meet income, or in some cases to exceed it. If
we do not increase our income we will not have more to spend. Somewhere I
have read that everyone is rich if he is satisfied with what he has.
Now I do not want to say that we should not strive to
make more money, but if it is necessary for our wives to work to get more we
should not strive in that manner. I had a patient whose husband insisted
that she work so he could have all the things he wanted. She
was most unhappy because she wanted to stay at home with her children, but
he threatened to leave her if she did. John Wesley once said that we should
make all we can, save all we can and give all we can. This statement
essentially appeals to our greed, to our desire for security, and to our
altruistic needs.
As I have noted above there are many women in modern
medicine. I was recently in the hospital for treatment of my heart disease.
I have had angina off and on for years and I had to have angioplasties for
partial occlusion of two of the major arteries of my heart. While in the
hospital I had a host of physicians who were responsible for my care. Since
I was hospitalized in a teaching hospital, there were many residents and
fellows who were helping with my care. On my second admission, my unmarried
resident was a young woman who finally came to examine me at 2 AM. Needless
to say I did not appreciate the interruption with my sleep. I asked her how
old she was and she told me that she was 28 years old. Later one of the
cardiology fellows, a female, came in at 6:30 AM. She was dressed
beautifully and her grooming was impeccable. Her perfume was subtle but
pleasant. She was perfectly made up. She must have had to arise from her bed
around 5 AM to come in looking and smelling like she did at that time. She
did not represent what I expected a female
"fellow"
to be. She too was in her late 20’s. I felt so sorry for both of these
women, for they had passed up their most fertile years and would be rearing
children, if they ever have any, later in life when their vigor is beginning
to wane. They would have expended it on their careers.
In a presentation to our Christian medical students a few
years ago Dr. John Patrick, a Canadian internist and researcher, strongly
urged the women in our group to get their education and then focus on having
a family and attending to them until their school years before they went
back into practice. I do not know what the reaction of the women in the
group was. I suspect it was not favorable since they have been brain washed
by the feminists in our society in believing that women should be in
competition with men at all levels. There is, however, one major difference
between women and men. Men cannot have babies, and men were not created to
be the parent who was to primarily socialize children. Women were!!
In the light of my forgoing polemic, let us now examine
the reasons why the role of women should be what Frances Welsing mentioned
above -- that it should conform to biblical principles, and not what the
feminists declare it to be.
(1) Women were created to be
the primary parent to nurture children. I have noted above that it is
inherent in their nature.
(2) They are far better
equipped emotionally to affirm children. Women are naturally more loving
toward children. I observe my wife and my daughters and other women in
society and note that they are more physical and verbal in their
relationships with children. There are some men who like to hold and fondle
children, but they are more likely to do it in an excitingly rough way.
Fathers are usually the main source of excitement in a child's
life. This is a source of affirmation for children but not the main source.
Children need physical love or they will be stunted emotionally, for it is
through affirmation that they learn to love and be loved.
(3) Women are created to be
more attentive to a child's
needs. I observed in the foregoing that even immature girls respond by
awakening from their sleep to a child's
cry. Men only do so after they have children of their own.
(4) God created men and women
to have their children in their most vigorous years. The years of highest
fertility are from 18 to 25. It is not impossible to have children later in
life, for we must remember Sarah and Hannah, but I once read an article that
first children are more vigorous and tend to have increased levels of
intelligence. I do not know if this is true, but from my casual observations
it is true in many cases. If it is generally true it can be one of the
arguments against abortion. The writer of the article cited the demise of
Carthage as a good example of what he was asserting. The Carthaginians
sacrificed their first born sons to Molech.
(5) Biblically it is the woman's
role to be involved in the commercial world. If you read carefully Proverbs
31 it describes the ideal wife who does work commercially, but it must be
remembered that this was written in a primarily agrarian culture where
almost all commercial activity women carried out was in the home. They were
there to nurture their children. This was true in our early years in this
country. It is only in the 20th
century that we departed from our agrarian culture. In an industrial
society, women are taken out of the home and are not present to attend to
the needs of their children.
(6) Putting children in day
care and after school care is detrimental to the development of intimate
relationships. A study of children raised in a Kibbutz in Israel
demonstrated that these children who had been in day care or school all of
their lives were able to relate on a friendly basis, but were woefully
deficient in establishing intimate relationships. This meant that they did
not court well or establish marriages characterized by intimacy. Such a
deficiency is a handicap for happiness.
(7) Stay at home moms are able
to home school or supplement the education of a child. My mother who had
been a teacher, but was a stay at home mom, supplemented my education
mightily. She read to me early on, and when I started reading at four and
one-half she listened to me read and increased my vocabulary as any good
teacher would do. She also saw to it that I had more than enough
supplemental reading material. As well, she taught me to do my
"numbers"
so that I started to school quite early. My mom also worked with my brother
who had dyslexia until he finally learned to read. Both of us obtained
doctoral degrees primarily because she encouraged us in our education to
achieve at the highest level. The same was true for our own children who all
have college degrees. Two of them have graduate degrees.
(8) Finally, a working mom is
tired when she gets home. Most of the time she has chores to do. The first
thing is to cook dinner and afterward clean up the table, then do the
dishes. When this is finished she has to see to it that the children=s
home work is done. If there are little children she has to bathe them and
put them to bed. If there is laundry to do it has to be done. When it is
finished she has to fold and put clothes away. Then she has to straighten
and clean the house especially if there are small children. I could go on
but you must remember that she has already worked for eight hours in her
job, but before that she had to get the children up and dressed and ready
for day care or school. What a life! When does she have time to nurture her
children? These comments especially apply to single moms.
(9) If they have the right
philosophy to live by, stay at home moms in an intact family have the time
to pass on a set of traditional beliefs to their children that will really
have value, i.e. their beliefs will make a favorable difference in their
lives. The beliefs of the secular world do not have ultimate value.
Increasing numbers of women entered into the work force
during WWII. Feminism accelerated the exodus from the home and having
children and nurturing them has been made a second rate career. This was not
God's intent. If we want
to know why there has been moral decay in our society all one has to do is
to realize that the character of our children is dependent on the parenting
they receive. Can we change the roles of women in our society? We certainly
need to do it if possible. It is the job of the church to make it come
about.